Lords of War in Casual Games — A Conversation with Sam

Hierophant1 (7) (Medium)So, in a recent 40k game against Sam, I sprung a Hierophant bio-titan on him without warning (see the detailed battle report here).  It’s something that I’ve been threatening to do to various opponents since 7th edition came out, but also something that didn’t seem quite right to do.  Well, that evening, I got a wild hair and decided to throw it in the list.

Anywho, after the game, I thought I’d pick Sam’s brain about it, since it’s the only time I’d ever seen a Lord of War used in a casual game outside of Apocalypse.  I thought getting his point of view might be helpful.  So, what follows is a brief interview I did with him on the topic in a Q&A Style:

So, before our game, had you ever played against a Lord of War outside of Apocalypse?  Have you ever played one yourself?  Was it in a friendly game or a tournament?

I played one friendly game where there were two Lords of War on both sides. It was epic and fun. One went super nova and killed another in the blast, as well as a lot of other stuff around it. It was a 2 v 2 game with each person bringing 2000 points or so.  I also played a list with a Knight Titan included. This was in a tournament setting and I learned a lot about the effectiveness of this model. It was a lot of fun to play but didn’t feel too over powered.

Do you think that they’re balanced in the game of 40k?

I think they are balanced in Maelstrom missions more so then the old style missions. If you don’t have an answer for them, you can complete objectives for points. They add a certain amount of urgency to the game because you lose units to them quickly. Lords of War also come at many different points costs so there is a limiting factor just because of the points.

How did you feel about playing one unannounced in a casual game of 40k?

wh39kHierovSam (15)It depends on the setting really. I like to know ahead of time but I also don’t like tailoring an army just to beat a specific list. It put me on edge initially, mostly because I’m not used to seeing them. 40K is a game of strategy and GW has added new playing pieces to the game, namely flyers and Lords of War. Nobody likes change but the more games I play the more I realize they just require different strategies to beat. It’s hard to adapt your old tactics to these new threats sometimes.

Do you feel like your opponent should ask your permission before playing one in a casual game?

I’m a big proponent of house rules in this area, and the letter of the law. I said I didn’t care what was fielded against me and it turned out to be a really fun game. In fact going forward I’ll keep in mind when saying this that it might happen again, and I welcome it. I think a clear house rule in this area would alleviate any bad blood that may come up because of how people feel regarding Lords of War.

What was your initial reaction to seeing it in my list?

At first I was a little bummed because I knew I didn’t have an army setup to deal with it that well. An all deep striking army that focuses on being close to your enemy is tough to play when a Heirophant is standing in your enemies ranks. After the bummer moment, came the intimidation factor, how do I deal with THAT! Then the gears start spinning to think of a strategy to win.

What was it like to actually face it in the game?

During the game it wasn’t that bad, other than being so wide it can hold two objectives. It was so big it acted like another piece of terrain. I always forget that they can move 12 as well. The Heirophant did exactly what I thought it would do, kill at least one unit each turn.

I noticed you didn’t shoot at it a single time.  Was that a conscious strategy, or merely coincidence?

wh39kHierovSam (9)I figured I had two options, go all in and try to kill it with everything I have or just ignore it and kill everything else. I lost a unit to deep strike mishap and the rest of my units were coming in on a 4 plus instead of a 3 plus. Because of these disadvantages I didn’t feel confident enough to take it head on. So I chose to avoid it completely. There is no point in wounding something you will never kill. I had a lot of power fists but it would have been difficult to get them all into hand to hand at the same time with it. I had 3 other monstrous creatures to deal with that were much softer targets. Plus committing units to hand to hand are units that aren’t near an objective.

After facing it, did it change your opinion of them in standard games of 40k?

Yeah, the more I play against them the more okay I get with them being in regular games. I would probably demand that the mission be a Maelstrom mission though. Lords of War are restrictive because of their points cost and I think that was evident in our game.

Do you have anything else you’d like to add to the conversation?

The Lord of War did not win the game we played. It was a factor, a big one at that, but not the deciding one. Your Tyranid armies low model count could very well have been it’s downfall. I felt like I lost the game because I lost a unit before turn 1 to deep strike mishap. I drew missions that were very difficult or impossible for me to complete at the beginning of the game. My strategy is to deep strike in and kill entire enemy units, my Sternguard should have been able to kill the Carnifex but I rolled poorly. I should have focused the Carnifex’s more then the flying Hive Tyrant. I had some really long scatter dice roles with templates and Drop Pods.

I enjoyed the game and that’s what matters, I’ve won enough 40K games that winning isn’t as big of a deal as it used to be, I look for those memorable games now and I’ll probably remember this one for awhile. I was also happy with the amount of points I got all things considered.

It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise to me that Sam took such a mature response to the entire event because that’s just the sort of guy he is.  That is why he has an open invite to come play games at my house any time.  In the future, though Lords of War are legal in the game, I still think I’ll try to get my opponent’s permission before playing them: not everyone would take it in stride like Sam did.

Advertisements

2 comments on “Lords of War in Casual Games — A Conversation with Sam

  1. I can’t help but feel like it depends on the super-heavy that gets taken. A Knight is fine for most games, but I’m not sure that a Heirophant or a Warhound is going to be fun to play against every time.

    I’ve been really digging a standard set of restrictions that people can play towards. Comp in 40k hasn’t always been very well received, but playing Fantasy for so long (and the comp that is VERY prevalent in that game system), I’m glad the local events are switching to comp packs. I’m pretty sure the only events that haven’t been ITC have been either at Bosco’s (so no one played) or Andrew’s Team Tournament (which was fine, due to all the restrictions in the Adepticon Format).

    The ITC format feels for the most part pretty balanced, and the list of super-heavies that you can bring isn’t too restrictive. I like the changes to the (ranged) D-table and stomps, making them a little most fair and easier to swallow.

    But that’s all my opinion anyway – the only Super-Heavy I’ve played with recently is a Wraithknight, and he’s really only good because he’s under-costed.

    • It’s really all about balance. None of them are that bad if they’re balanced. Really, facing the Hierophant with a normal army means that you basically have to ignore it because there’s just not a reasonable way to kill it. But when it’s taking up half of my points, ignoring it isn’t necessarily a bad strategy. Sure, it can kill a unit per turn, but during the course of that game it killed: a drop pod; a tactical squad; half of a sternguard squad; an ironclad; and finished off a terminator captain. Hell, even if he did all that damage by himself, that’s not even 1000 points total.

      There’s definitely a mental barrier though. I suspect that I would also be uncomfortable facing something like that without forewarning (despite knowing that it’s a perfectly legal option in the rules). But, as Sam said, it really isn’t that bad, and it just takes a little creativity to work around.

      Of course, when the superheavies get undercosted (as you say the wraithknight is), I’m sure they’re horrible–but that’s the same with any unit–just magnified when it comes to lords of war.

      On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Warhammer 39,9999 wrote:

      >

Have something to add?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s